Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

DogWellNet

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Finnish report: An investigation would curb problems with dog breeding through monitoring criteria and ethical delegation

By DWN Staff
Published

finnish-food-authority-logo.pngAn investigation would curb problems with dog breeding through monitoring criteria and ethical delegation

September 2, 2020, from: Dated link: https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/sv/privatkunder/sallskaps--och-hobbydjur/nyheter/en-utredning-skulle-tygla-problem-med-hundavel-genom-overvakningskriterier-och-etisk-delegation/ See Internet archives: An investigation would curb problems with dog breeding through monitoring criteria and ethical delegation - Livsmedelsverket (archive.org)

NOTE from IPFD: The summary page posted by the Finnish Food Authority shown below is translated by Google from the original.


According to an investigation carried out by the Natural Resources Institute (Luke) together with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (JSM) and the National Food Administration, the aim is to eliminate dog breeding that causes the animal suffering and hereditary diseases with the help of monitoring criteria. For some dog breeds, the criteria would exclude a large proportion of the dogs from breeding. The inquiry also recommends that an ethical delegation be established for breeding and that the veterinarians' reporting obligation be extended.


The monitoring criteria described in the investigation focus on problems due to shortened skull, but also include criteria that can be applied to a larger group of dogs. Shortened skull, ie. excessive brachycephaly, increases the risk of the animal suffering from a number of hereditary defects and diseases that impair the animal's quality of life and cause the animal suffering and significant inconvenience. The problems are associated with, among other things, the animal's breathability, set of teeth, reproductive ability and the health of the eyes, skin and digestive tract. The investigation states that the breeding of an excessively short skull shape can be considered contrary to Finland's current Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act prohibits such breeding that may cause the animal suffering or significant inconvenience to the animal's health or well-being.


According to the proposed monitoring criteria, a breeding dog must not show serious malformations associated with bracycephalic anatomy that increase the risk of significant harm to the animal's well - being, or have diseases or symptoms due to excessively short skull shape. The criteria are based on the principle that a dog with a minor defect or disease can be used for breeding if the other party in the combination does not have the same defect or disease.


For some of the criteria, a transition period of e.g. five years, when breeders have time to find individuals who meet the monitoring criteria for breeding and to refine the dogs' anatomy so that it becomes healthier. The breeder must be able to show that the animals he or she uses for breeding meet the requirements of animal welfare legislation. For many breeds, this means that breeding dogs must undergo several health examinations before mating.
The inconveniences to well-being caused by excessively short skull shape, as well as other exaggerated traits, can be permanently averted only by changing these traits in a more normal direction by means of breeding. Due to the monitoring criteria, a large proportion of dogs are eliminated from breeding within certain breeds. In the case of some breeds, in the light of current knowledge, it is also not possible to change the shape of the skull through breeding, as these breeds do not have any genetic forms that give a normal skull. In such a situation, the processing can continue e.g. using racial crosses.


In connection with the introduction of the monitoring criteria, it is also necessary to consider various ways of intervening in the import of such animals for which the breeding does not meet the requirements of Finnish animal welfare legislation. A step in this direction is to increase the sellers 'obligation to provide information about the problems that in the investigation are said to cause significant inconvenience to the well-being of dogs and their significance for the dogs' well-being.


The investigation also proposes an obligation for the treating veterinarian to report hereditary defects and diseases that have required care of an animal that is used for breeding or that impairs the animal's quality of life. In addition, the establishment of an ethical delegation for breeding is recommended. This is an impartial, consulting expert body that assists the authorities in difficult issues concerning animal breeding.


In order to make the boundary between permitted and prohibited breeding clearer, the inquiry considers it necessary to develop legislation on animal welfare. In connection with the new law on animal welfare, an ordinance is needed on which the supervision that enforces the law can be based, as well as instructions on supervision. The regulation shall prescribe in more detail, for example, the hereditary defects to which the veterinarians' obligation to report applies. It must also be prescribed for such defects that clearly exclude the animal from breeding.


More information:
Chief Inspector Sari Salminen, tel. +358 29 520 4971, sari.salminen@ruokavirasto.fi  (Animal Welfare Monitoring)

Specialist Tiina Pullola, tel. +358 29 516 2108, tiina.pullola@mmm.fi (Animal Welfare Law )

Researcher Riitta Kempe,   .kempe @ luke.fi (the author of the report)

 

 

 

IPFD NOTE:  Table of Contents of the investigation file below:

 

 

ToC Finnish Investigation 1.png

ToC Finnish Investigation 2.png

ToC Finnish Investigation 3.png

ToC Finnish Investigation 4 (2).png

 

 

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

David Eikelberg

IPFD Board

Perhaps funding a commission established specifically for selecting mating pairs with the goal of bringing back healthier physical attributes is in order.  

Brenda Bonnett

Advanced Members

At first blush, it may be easier to do this under the proposed system in Finland, than in, say, the Netherlands. There the restrictions are such that, for some breeds, seemingly no dogs will qualify.

David Eikelberg

IPFD Board

In our very small population of the Black Russian Terrier, we have adopted a policy of "working in a positive direction" and trying our very best to educate anyone who will listen, in intelligent genetic sorting for breeding pairs, using the best we have while at teh same time striving for the maximum genetic diversity possible as well a requisite traits and attributes.  Where our breeders have gone awry, we attempt to correct the situation through judge's education seminars and articles in our newsletters, as well as just plain talk on social media.  Not ideal but it is our hope that the tremendously successful efforts of the Red Star Kennels in Russia, which resulted in this amazing breed, will be preserved for as long as possible.  Further, our small numbers mean that we have an opportunity to make course corrections that encompass a large percentage of our breed, long before our population of BRTs becomes unmanageable, as is the case with more popular breeds.  What a terrible loss it would be were someone to declare that none of them were fit to breed, and thereby cause their extinction.  I would suppose the brachycephalic breed lovers would feel the same.  

Anyone interested in an intense 5 volume study of the lineage of the BRT and the incredibly science-based and purpose bred breeding strategy utilized by Red Star in Russia can access an incredible depth and breadth of information and definitive action in a series available via Amazon by by my good friend Canadian author, Mr. Donald B. Anderson.  And yes, the ever-pragmatic and dogmatic Russians did terminate some breeding lines that were beyond repair.  But they did it with a clear punch list of required traits.  For example, when they introduced the Ovcharka, the result proved too vicious to control and a portion of that lineage was destroyed in order to work in a better direction.  A more humane approach suitable for today's ethics and morals might be to let certain bloodlines simply die out, while the remaining more suitable others are used to work in a positive direction.  https://smile.amazon.com/Creation-Black-Russian-Terrier-KGBeast/dp/1500932191/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=Donald+B+Anderson&qid=1599135839&s=books&sr=1-2 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...
Disclaimer
All materials on this site are the property of their respective authors and may not be reprinted without the author's written permission, unless otherwise indicated. The views and opinions expressed by the authors and those providing information or comments on this website are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of the International Partnership for Dogs (IPFDogs) or DogWellNet.com. We make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability or validity of any information and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries or damages arising from its display or use. All rights reserved. DogWellNet © 2014 - 2026
Find Us On
Contact Us
Questions? Comments? Looking to get involved in our work? We’d like to hear from you!
or if you prefer feel free to reach out to us on social media.

Powered by Invision Community

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.